Sometimes we get requests about “how does ODM compare to software XYZ”.
I have no answer to that.
I was thinking it could be cool to have 2-3 datasets processed in ODM as well as other software, place them onto a map and have a comparison tool to showcase differences. I think it would be interesting to see where we’re at in terms of quality and what still needs to be worked on.
This requires licenses to software or a trial (which some of you might have?). The three “most popular” ones that would be interesting to compare results to are:
- DroneDeploy
- Metashape
- Pix4D
The three datasets that are up for comparison are:
- GitHub - OpenDroneMap/odm_data_aukerman
- GitHub - pierotofy/drone_dataset_brighton_beach
- GitHub - pierotofy/drone_dataset_sand_key
Up for grab, limited edition badge to whoever posts one or more datasets processed in one or more of these software:
The output should contain:
- Orthophoto
- DSM
- Point Cloud
- Version of software used (or name of software + date of processing)
Processed using “medium quality” / default settings, 2 cm/px resolution.
Results
= Available
= Claimed
= In progress
DroneDeploy
aukerman: (@HAWK-i.us)
brighton_beach: (@HAWK-i.us)
sand_key: (@HAWK-i.us)
Metashape
aukerman: (@vantageds)
brighton_beach: (@vantageds)
sand_key:
Pix4D
aukerman: (@gpsman)
brighton_beach: (@gpsman)
sand_key: (@gpsman)
DroneMapper
aukerman: (@Saijin_Naib, @dronemapper-io)
brighton_beach: (@Saijin_Naib, @dronemapper-io)
sand_key: (@Saijin_Naib, @dronemapper-io)