Hiya - only frustrated at myself, I seem to suggest features which already exist a lot
I should have made that clearer.
I agree - adding an option for
—out_crs (not necessarily named that) using EPSG codes is likely a valuable thing for people who don’t want to use proj.
I think that for most folks, yes, EPSG codes are the mainstay/shortcut. Proj exposes the fundamental stuff if you want to do something exotic (including compound CRS and all the transforms you suggest).
from my PoV, I think we can leave all the other datum shifts to post-ODM tasking, although maybe there’s a webODM option there…
I’ll have some time to tinker with ODM again soon, I’ve already done some work around aligning output with other data in EPSG:28355, let’s see if I get closer a priori using the