WebODM doesn't generate orthophoto

Hi everyone! My problem is that two weeks ago (aprox) my webODM doesn’t generate the orthophoto. I don’t know what is happening, cause I’m doing exactly the same that I did before. I think that the source of the problem is a possible update of webODM. Cause I saw that some files in github repository have changes, maybe that could be the problem.
Thanks a lot in advance for any help that you can give me…

  1. Link to pictures

  2. Task output: The task output is on a textfile that I added to pictures folder shared in the point 1)

  3. In my last try, I changed the value of some parameters this way:
    {‘name’: “orthophoto-resolution”, ‘value’:5.0},
    {‘name’: “ignore-gsd”, ‘value’:“true”},
    {‘name’: “use-exif”, ‘value’:“true”},
    {‘name’: “dsm”, ‘value’:“true”},
    {‘name’: “dtm”, ‘value’:“true”}

  4. I’m Executing WebODM with the docker version in my laptop, which has the next hardware:
    Processor: Core i5 of sixth generation 2.3 GH
    RAM: 8GB
    OS: Windows 10
    Browser: Google Chrome

Mm, I was able to process the dataset, but I got a very small orthophoto (less than 1KB as a result). This makes sense as the area covered by the pictures is really small. What happens if you lower orthophoto-resolution to 0.1?

Thanks a lot pierotofy!:slight_smile:
Now my orthophoto file has 157KB, but I can’t see anything.
In the miniature sight, I just see a black square and in tools like Qgis I don’t see anything.
Thanks a lot again! I really appreciate your help! :slight_smile:

Well, increase it again. How about 0.01?

The area you covered is small. Orthophoto resolution is expressed in cm / pixel.

Insufficient memory or network error :(:cry:

I have tried to load this pictures in Pix4D and I have seen that Pix4D doesn’t recognize GPS info. So could be WebODM doesn’t being recognizig GPS info too? although when I see the task_output look like yes but with the results that I’m getting look like no…

I already have fixed. The problem was the exif info, I do not know why they were not being read, but now yeah. Thanks a lot to everyone! I really appreciate your help!

2 Likes

Hi, How can you resolved? Thanks

Sorry for don’t be more useful, but on my case the problem was that exif info was being deleted by an operation that I was doing on the pictures earlier than I read it.

Ah ok, thanks for answering!