I was curious if anyone has any recommendations on GPS units that they use to mark GCPs and verification points. I do not have the money for a survey grade base and rover type GPS unit but I am hoping for something accurate enough for jobs involving volume measurements and agricultural mapping.
If you are up for some stuff that’s more technically challenging than a polished commercial GPS unit, ArduSimple (https://www.ardusimple.com/) sells a board with a uBlox ZED-F9P dual-frequency GNSS receiver, as well as antennas and radios. You can get a base and rover for less than $700 all inclusive, which as a set will easily get you 5cm horizontal and 10cm vertical accuracy (better if conditions are good and you know what you are doing).
This is really interesting stuff, thanks for sharing!
An emlid Reach RS+ is in the price range of 800 USD, could you please explain the difference and benefits over ardusimple? I did a quick internet search and they cost both the same approximately, even if you build yours?
The Emlid Reach RS+ is about $800 for each unit, and if you don’t have access to a base station you need two for high accuracy.
The ArduSimple is about $300 for each unit including antenna (call it $400 if you go for higher-quality antennas). Again, unless you have access to another base station for corrections, you need two. So about half the price.
To oversimplify a bit:
Both will give similar (excellent) results if used properly
The ArduSimple is way cheaper
The Emlid takes way less fiddling
So it probably boils down to whether you are more constrained by time & expertise or money.
In my case, I also happen to like the mostly-FOSS approach of ArduSimple, but that’s a philosophical rather than practical concern.
At the moment those units are likely to be a little to expensive for me. What is the minimal degree of accuracy that is required for things like mapping crops fields or performing volume estimations of things like gravel piles at construction sites?
Unfortunately, that is something you need to decide. If you have had talks with your customers, you can decide what they need/want, and set your product standards and pricing accordingly.
From my work in precision ag, I’ll volunteer this: Almost nobody has per-nozzle/per-row variable rate equipment (including things like GreenSeeker). What that means is they’re doing variable rate per implement, which could be something like 20-40m wide depending upon the size of the farm/field. The difference in a meter or two with a setup like that is completely negligible.
However, stockpiles can be more tricky. Again, what is their expectation, and can you reasonably match it with the standards you set for your own products?
Is there an advantage of going with these devices instead of a Garmin GPSMap 65s?
I have one of those Garmin, they have a feature for averaging waypoint measuring, wo you basically stay a good while on one point and it increases precision by averaging multiple measures taken at the same spot. https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/715072#overview
I have never worked with GCP before, would it make sense to use GCP with this Garmin GPS?
I’m not sure the Garmnin GPSMAPs output raw RINEX measurements so you can do PPK like you can with the Bad Elf units. I’m also not finding their rating for expected accuracy like they used to rate their older products with.
I have not had the chance to do a head-to-head comparison of GPS averaging on the newer Garmin units vs the Bad Elf vs a regular cellphone, so I can’t comment here.
GCPs are almost always a good idea for the reconstruction, even if you need to use your phone (and do some “short” point averaging [60s is a big jump in quality from a single reading]).
Check my evaluation of the Emlid Reach M2 Multi Band GNSS Receiver here. You can use as a standalone receiver if in proper range of CORS base stations for post processing or in cell phone range for real time NTRP corrections in kinematic mode.