Normal docker split/merge output vs ClusterODM distributed split/merge

See the attached screen shots. I’m getting mixed results between using Normal docker (single instance) split/merge output vs ClusterODM distributed split/merge.

single instance split/merge is giving me a full orthophoto from the dataset. No problems (other than taking 3.5 days to run (701 images).

ClusterODM distributed split/merge is showing zero data for about half of the imaged area, but it completes the task in about 4 hours. Once you set the transparency band to None in QGIS, you can see that it should have the entire image, but doesn’t.

Should this be a ticket?

20%20AM 47%20AM 59%20AM 14%20AM

1 Like

Mm, never seen this before, could be a bug. Probably ticket worthy.

1 Like