GCP ... GCP01, renamed gcp0?

[SURV69]

My intent is to call “gcp”, with personal, unique reference … GAR, HSE, PST, PCL, etc. …
Presently, I only use gcpXX, or GCPXX, I always prefer CAPS(easier to see) …
I never use gcp00, or gcp0, always prefer the first control point to be gcp1 or GCP01

It seems that WebODM, is shifting my number to make my first gcp be gcp0, even though the file in the work fold calls for GCP01.

Does this mean that “unique”, identifiers must follow the gcp00, gcp01, gcp02 … format, and if so do these numbers have to be numerically sequential, and not be an ascii descriptor?

[bernarde]

We already note that issue in another thread :

ODM Report GCP Error Part

Hello, i have used gcp points in my process. The gcp names was like; ykn1 , ykn2, ykn3 … However, the names are shows in the report with gcp0, gcp1, gcp2… Why the names are different ? Which gcp name equals to my gcp point? [IMG_20220311_103030] Thank you

From my experience you can name your gcps as you want but the report will rename/renumber them.
There are already various topics on reworking the report but it is a huge work.

Minor issues with current generation of quality report

I stared at the quality report this afternoon for the first time in a few weeks and wanted to share my thoughts. I acknowledge that big parts of the report come from OpenSfM and have checked their docs to get a better understanding. The “Processing Time” value in the “Dataset Summary” section should use integers for the hours and minutes, and for seconds too if the precision is at the one-second level. OpenSfM gives total number of sections as a float which is not bad if that’s the precision …

Command line arguments in orm_report

Regarding all paramters values you can retrieve them from the log.json file. Not as sexy as a pdf but still you can access it and store it along the report to remember.

[SURV69]

sorry … I did a search but missed this posting …

[bernarde]

No problem, it is important to signal it so we know it’s a wanted feature